A smartphone lens attachment improves the quality of referrals to eye casualty.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In recent years, eye casualty clinics have seen significant increases in patient numbers with reduced capacity. COVID-19 has exacerbated this issue and demonstrated the potential of telemedicine as a solution. Our study evaluated the potential benefit of a smartphone-based lens attachment to improve the referral pathway for anterior segment related complaints in eye casualty. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients with anterior segment complaints were recruited. A questionnaire was completed with each patient to simulate the history from the point of referral. White light and cobalt blue photos were captured using a smartphone lens. The clinician reviewing the patient was asked to document the actual diagnosis and the appropriate time-frame within which they felt the patient could safely have been seen within; both with and without the option of management advice at the time of triage. The subsequent images and questionnaires were reviewed by a single consultant Ophthalmologist who was independent to the data collection process. The assessor was asked to make a diagnosis and management plan based upon the questionnaire ('History'), and the questionnaire with the photo ('History with Image'), as well as rate their clinical confidence on a 1-5 scale. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in "History with Image" (98.2%), when compared to "History" only (48.2%). "History with Image" prevented significantly more appointments when compared to "History" alone, at similar levels to retrospective clinic review. Preventable appointments were increased if clinical advice was possible. Timeframe of appointments between 'History with Image' and 'Clinic' appointments was similar. Clinical'Confidence was significantly higher at 4.5 with 'History with Image' when compared to 2.37 with 'History Only'. CONCLUSION: A low-cost smartphone lens attachment, alongside a standardised clinical questionnaire, can improve the referral pathway to the hospital eye service by reducing unnecessary appointments, while improving clinical confidence and diagnostic accuracy during triage. Further work to evaluate referral pathways, including the development of systems that allow for secure image transmission are needed to understand the feasibility for the widespread adoption of this technology.

Surgical Grade and Repeat Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Procedures with Risk Stratification and Educational Considerations.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Peripheral laser iridotomy (PLI) is a commonly performed procedure. While effective, repeat procedures (RPs) may be required for a variety of causes. We report the causes and rate of RP PLI and whether surgical grade is a risk factor. METHODS: Two years of retrospective data from 282 patients who had undergone PLI at a single UK ophthalmology department were retrieved using an electronic medical record system (Medisoft, Leeds, UK). RESULTS: A total of 253 patients underwent analysis with 20 requiring RPs. Our data identified a correlation between experience of the operating surgeon and an increase in RP rate, with statistical significance (p=0.036) observed between consultants and registrars. No other statistically significant risk factors were identified from our study. Prescriber preference for iopidine was observed. From our findings and the current literature, prognostic factors that appear to influence RP rate include surgical grade, patient compliance, Asian ethnicity, and anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: RP rate increases in PLI when a junior surgeon is performing the procedure, and thus cases with established prognostic factors for RPs should have senior input. Formal and standardized YAG-laser training should be implemented alongside risk stratification of patients to improve both trainee education and patient care.